digits in x
|
11-24-2015, 09:34 AM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: digits in x
(11-23-2015 11:58 AM)fhub Wrote: BTW, here's my final version for Kaprekar numbers - different to my first version that I've sent you via PM (with 22 steps, optimized for size), this version is MUCH faster, but has 37 steps (now also showing the first number 1, without 1 you could even save 3 more steps 0004-0006). Hi, Very impressive celerity even for numbers up after 999.999 ! I love your fashion to do because if a number is Kaprekar you stop and display it, and if it is not one you display the follow that is. Well done, mine say only "yes" or "no". And many steps for this ! I have to master flowcharts and greats functions of our WP34s. "Damned !" you win again (LOL) ! Your fully. GĂ©rard. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 04:29 PM
RE: digits in x - Didier Lachieze - 11-22-2015, 04:58 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 05:22 PM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-22-2015, 05:40 PM
RE: digits in x - Marcus von Cube - 11-22-2015, 05:43 PM
RE: digits in x - Dieter - 11-22-2015, 05:49 PM
RE: digits in x - Marcus von Cube - 11-22-2015, 05:51 PM
RE: digits in x - Didier Lachieze - 11-22-2015, 05:56 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 06:33 PM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-23-2015, 11:58 AM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015 09:34 AM
RE: digits in x - Dieter - 11-22-2015, 05:46 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-23-2015, 04:48 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 11:05 AM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-24-2015, 12:07 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 07:03 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 07:39 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)