Post Reply 
RECT_P but without filling
11-30-2015, 06:28 PM
Post: #8
RE: RECT_P but without filling
(11-30-2015 06:08 PM)Thomas_Sch Wrote:  Hello eried,
your code is calling RECT_P_NO2FILL 2 times. Or are I'm wrong?

Oh, you are right! that's why the performance was so similar, the routine using lines is much slower (62848 vs 48717 ticks)

My website: ried.cl
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RECT_P but without filling - hpfx - 11-27-2015, 01:35 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - DrD - 11-27-2015, 02:46 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - primer - 11-27-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - primer - 11-30-2015, 09:04 AM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - eried - 11-30-2015, 03:33 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - eried - 11-30-2015 06:28 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - primer - 11-30-2015, 08:42 PM
RE: RECT_P but without filling - Han - 11-30-2015, 09:55 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)