The most compact algorithm for Simpson's rule??
|
12-12-2015, 09:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-12-2015 10:14 PM by Dieter.)
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The most compact algorithm for Simpson's rule??
(12-12-2015 08:29 PM)Namir Wrote: Yes, A ends up as B+h causing the loop to stop iterating. Since the test if A>B is done *after* the summation this leads to f(B+h) as the last added term – and yields a wrong result. The last term should be f(B–h), resp. f(B) with your method of computing this value twice. As already suggested, all this is better done with a simple loop counter. Dieter |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)