Post Reply 
F distribution on the 41C
12-19-2015, 09:18 AM
Post: #22
RE: F distribution on the 41C
(12-18-2015 11:26 PM)quantalume Wrote:  I replaced the LBL 70 - 90 with LBL 02 - 05 (single byte). This reduced program length by 7 bytes and improved speed slightly..

I often choose two-byte LBLs and the corresponding 3-byte GTOs because they are able to record their target address for longer jumps. You know that once a GTO has found the LBL it jumps to, this position is recorded within the GTO command ("compiled GTO") so that subsequent branches are executed much faster. Here the 3-byte-versions allow for longer jumps than their 2-byte counterparts, so just to be sure I prefer the former.

In this program two-byte GTOs (resp. single-byte LBLs) may be sufficient, at least in most cases. What makes me wonder is your remark that this speeded up the program slightly. I would have expected no change at best.

Dieter
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-16-2015, 05:02 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-16-2015, 06:05 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-16-2015, 07:55 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-16-2015, 08:22 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-16-2015, 09:03 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-16-2015, 09:08 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Namir - 12-17-2015, 12:52 AM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-17-2015, 03:31 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-18-2015, 10:25 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Namir - 12-19-2015, 02:37 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-20-2015, 05:02 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Namir - 12-20-2015, 11:15 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-21-2015, 07:24 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Namir - 12-21-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-25-2015, 02:54 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-17-2015, 03:36 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-17-2015, 07:37 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-17-2015, 09:32 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-17-2015, 10:35 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-17-2015, 10:53 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-17-2015, 11:05 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-18-2015, 08:38 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-18-2015, 11:26 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - rprosperi - 12-19-2015, 01:39 AM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-19-2015, 09:00 AM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-19-2015 09:18 AM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-19-2015, 06:22 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-19-2015, 09:16 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - quantalume - 12-20-2015, 12:28 AM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-20-2015, 01:17 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Gene - 12-26-2015, 03:38 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-26-2015, 04:56 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Gene - 12-26-2015, 06:04 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Namir - 12-22-2015, 05:54 AM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-22-2015, 07:00 AM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Paul Dale - 12-22-2015, 07:30 AM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-22-2015, 07:50 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Paul Dale - 12-22-2015, 09:34 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-26-2015, 10:09 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Namir - 12-26-2015, 03:03 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Dieter - 12-26-2015, 05:19 PM
RE: F distribution on the 41C - Gene - 12-30-2015, 05:54 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)