newRPL: all results mode?
|
01-21-2016, 02:52 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL: all results mode?
(01-21-2016 12:59 PM)Claudio L. Wrote: Since newRPL swapped the behavior of + and ADD, we have all operators in place for list processing. If all other commands also accept list processing, there's no technical barrier for returning a list of results during evaluation of an expression. I think newRPL should, by default, behave the same as RPL in order to get expected results from existing code. Enhanced results, like this, are very useful for those that understand and expect them, but should IMHO only be enabled by some deliberate action, like setting a flag. I think backward compatibility for a core function such as this will be essential for adoption by many users. New command names for the enhanced modes is nice as it certainly adds clarity, but could easily get out of control due to likely large number of variations. How many would you expect? --Bob Prosperi |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
newRPL: all results mode? - Claudio L. - 01-21-2016, 12:59 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - rprosperi - 01-21-2016 02:52 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - Nigel (UK) - 01-21-2016, 04:14 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - Claudio L. - 01-21-2016, 06:59 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - rprosperi - 01-21-2016, 07:21 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - Nigel (UK) - 01-22-2016, 09:13 AM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - emece67 - 01-22-2016, 10:44 AM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - Claudio L. - 01-22-2016, 01:41 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - Claudio L. - 01-22-2016, 02:08 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - Nigel (UK) - 01-24-2016, 07:08 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - Claudio L. - 01-25-2016, 02:31 PM
RE: newRPL: all results mode? - Nigel (UK) - 01-26-2016, 09:37 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)