HP-17BII+ serial
|
02-02-2016, 03:36 AM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP-17BII+ serial
CORRECTION to my earlier post #3.
Yes indeed, when I happened to enter my own equation *correctly* into my HP-27S (and not using RAN# as it's a built-in function in the 27S), I do get the same result as other 27S owners have shown here! Sorry for the confusion! ------------------------------------------------ As for the different behaviour of the Solver in 17BII+ and earlier models like the 27S and 17BII: In "Technical Applications - Step-by-step solutions for your HP-27S or HP-19B calculator" there is a discussion on pages 14 and 15 how LET and GET change an equation. ..."When an unknown variable appears only once as a formal variable, the Solver can usually isolate a direct solution. ..."When the variable appears as the first argument of LET or as the argument of GET, it's not considered by the Solver in determining whether a direct solution can be found. Thus, a variable may occur many times in an equation, yet only once formally. In these instances, a direct solution may be found, but it will not normally be "correct" mathematically." This doesn't fully apply to the HP-17BII+ and here lies much of the confusion I believe. **Example 7 (from page 15 in Technical Applications) A=G(A)+1 Enter the equation, press CALC and CLEAR DATA Press A and 27S will display A=0 17BII+ will display A=1, apparently the correct answer. Press A again and 27S will display A=1 which is what we might expect. Each press of A will increment A by 1, so 27S will show 2,3,4,... However, 17BII will not increment A, A=1 is the final solution. This is not what we might expect! **Example 8 (from page 15 in Technical Applications) Q=L(A:A+1) Enter the equation, press CALC and CLEAR DATA Press Q and 27S will display Q=0 (However, if A is initialized first with A=0, then we get Q=1) 17BII+ will display Q=1, apparently the correct answer (no initialization necessary). Further presses of Q on the 27S will display Q=1,2,3,... what we expect. However, 17BII+ will display Q=3,5,7,... not what is expected! (For each run, the 17BII+ will do an additional evaluation of the expression). One way to simulate the behaviour of 27S is to enter Q=L(A:A+1/2) then store -0.5 in A before the first run. --- According to Cyrille de Brébisson the Solver in 17BII+ is the same, but transcribed in C. The "direct" solver part however seems to use a slightly different algorithm. http://www.hpmuseum.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/...ead=134189 I just wish that HP would have published a ""Technical Applications - Step-by-step solutions for your HP-17BII+ calculator"! |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
HP-17BII+ serial - tomisan - 02-01-2016, 12:19 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Don Shepherd - 02-01-2016, 01:26 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - tomisan - 02-01-2016, 03:24 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Don Shepherd - 02-01-2016, 04:45 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - rprosperi - 02-01-2016, 11:21 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Didier Lachieze - 02-02-2016, 01:07 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Don Shepherd - 02-02-2016, 02:42 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - tomisan - 02-02-2016 03:36 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Don Shepherd - 02-02-2016, 04:38 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - tomisan - 02-02-2016, 05:56 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Don Shepherd - 02-02-2016, 02:40 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - tomisan - 02-02-2016, 06:22 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Don Shepherd - 02-02-2016, 07:15 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Elwin - 02-02-2016, 09:25 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Elwin - 02-03-2016, 01:51 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Don Shepherd - 02-03-2016, 02:21 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - rprosperi - 02-02-2016, 09:03 PM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - tomisan - 02-15-2016, 08:09 AM
RE: HP-17BII+ serial - Don Shepherd - 02-15-2016, 10:14 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)