Post Reply 
Double factorial [wp34s]
02-13-2016, 06:53 AM
Post: #14
RE: Double factorial [wp34s]
(02-13-2016 04:46 AM)Paul Dale Wrote:  In XROM there is no reason to not use the pi/2 constant. The name is defined symbolically and if it gets renumbered, the assembler deals with it.

Is there a reason why these useful constants were not included in the regular CONST catalog as #pi/2, #ln2, #ln10, #sqrt2pi etc.? Is it the limited space again?

Dieter
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Paul Dale - 02-12-2016, 06:27 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Dieter - 02-12-2016, 07:49 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Dieter - 02-12-2016, 07:54 PM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Paul Dale - 02-13-2016, 12:14 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Paul Dale - 02-12-2016, 10:45 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Paul Dale - 02-12-2016, 10:33 PM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Paul Dale - 02-13-2016, 10:41 PM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Dieter - 02-15-2016, 07:03 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - emece67 - 02-13-2016, 12:57 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Paul Dale - 02-13-2016, 04:46 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Dieter - 02-13-2016 06:53 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Paul Dale - 02-13-2016, 07:05 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - Dieter - 02-13-2016, 07:00 PM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - emece67 - 02-13-2016, 09:15 AM
RE: Double factorial [wp34s] - John Keith - 02-14-2016, 03:24 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)