Any Surveyors?

[buffalo]

(John said)
That's funny, I get pretty much the opposite result. On a physical 50g:
<< CYLIN ->V2 RECT V-> >> about 49ms
#30EA6h SYSEVAL 26ms
<< ->V2 CYLIN V-> RECT >> 33ms
#30E79h SYSEVAL 10ms
making the SYSEVALs about twice as fast as well as not having to mess with system flags. Still seems silly to me to not include P->R and R->P as user functions.
John

My Post ***PLEASE NOTE BACKUP MEMORY PRIOR TO USING SYSEVALS***
---------
number format.....Std
Cas Modes _Approx (unticked)

stack (pre P->R, p->r)
4:
3:
2: 555.555
1: 55.9319444444

stack (pre R->P, r->p)
4:
3:
2: 311.20926336
1: 460.206641004

P->R << DEG #30EA6h SYSEVAL >> note now with DEG that RMollov found for me
R->P << DEG #30E79h SYSEVAL >> note DEG

i have just made up IMO a better program Timer

<< TICKS DEPTH ROLLD *stick program in here* TICKS DEPTH ROLL - B->R 8192 / >> 'Timer' STO

p->r << ->V2 CYLIN V-> RECT >>
r->P << CYLIN ->V2 RECT V-> >>
Results
-------
P->R 0.03942 secs (9 buttons pushed) different because of DEG
p->r 0.06091 " (4 buttons pushed) ??? different to John
R->P 0.02417 " (9 buttons pushed) different because of DEG
r->p 0.0487 " (4 buttons pushed) same as John