Search
Member List
Calendar
Help
|
Asterisks are not Sexy
|
|
04-20-2016, 08:30 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy
(04-19-2016 04:03 PM)sguth Wrote: Hey all, Not only it is ugly, but, as I already stated in another post: The SI (the international system of units) defines as the only accepted symbol for the multiplication between two numbers the cross. See the complete SI brochure on page 134 (english) or 45 (french). http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-b...nload.html I really don't see why we should use something different if it is already internationally defined. |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Asterisks are not Sexy - sguth - 04-19-2016, 04:03 PM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - eried - 04-19-2016, 05:45 PM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - Gilles - 04-19-2016, 05:59 PM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - Tim Wessman - 04-19-2016, 08:35 PM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - informach - 04-20-2016, 12:31 AM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - TASP - 04-20-2016, 01:25 AM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - retoa - 04-20-2016 08:30 AM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - DrD - 04-20-2016, 09:36 AM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - retoa - 04-20-2016, 12:07 PM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - DrD - 04-20-2016, 04:05 PM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - retoa - 04-21-2016, 09:02 AM
RE: Asterisks are not Sexy - Fortin - 04-20-2016, 11:49 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)