Post Reply 
For all you Prime Factor history fans, 9999999967 proves prime in ?
07-22-2016, 05:02 PM
Post: #11
RE: For all you Prime Factor history fans, 9999999967 proves prime in ?
(07-17-2016 10:24 PM)Paul Dale Wrote:  The performance isn't ideal. The big number arithmetic was written to be small not fast. This could be improved several orders of magnitude without too much effort.

I doubt it. The code is already written for integer mode, even if called from decimal mode.

Marcus von Cube
Wehrheim, Germany
http://www.mvcsys.de
http://wp34s.sf.net
http://mvcsys.de/doc/basic-compare.html
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: For all you Prime Factor history fans, 9999999967 proves prime in ? - Marcus von Cube - 07-22-2016 05:02 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)