An old puzzle, extended precision - and logs
|
07-28-2016, 12:16 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: An old puzzle, extended precision - and logs
(07-28-2016 09:26 AM)sa-penguin Wrote: This requires you to solve: 100 (1 - (99/100)^30) - which ends up having 60 decimal places. No, logs are not required. But they can be used to evaluate 0,99^30. (07-28-2016 09:26 AM)sa-penguin Wrote: I can see that: That's the way with using logs. (07-28-2016 09:26 AM)sa-penguin Wrote: I just can't see how to calculate logs (and anti-logs) to the required number of decimal places. At best, in my youth, I saw tables of logarithms to 5 decimal places. Do you really want a 60-digit result? Is this the result printed in the book? Then there's another approach that can even be used with pencil and paper. (07-28-2016 09:26 AM)sa-penguin Wrote: Is there a "lost art" for using log tables, to get the extended precision required? Or is there some other secret? I don't think this is a secret, but here is how you can do it: Code: (99/100)^30 Do this until 99^30, then shift the decimal point 60 digits left to get 0,7397... 1 minus this is 0,2602996... so the answer (times 100) is 26 cups. Dieter |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)