Improved change of integer base
|
03-01-2014, 07:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-01-2014 07:40 PM by Tim Wessman.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Improved change of integer base
>It would require to admit failing at the design stage
I don't think that is the case. I suspect you have linked two completely separate concepts/issues in your mind, when in reality they are quite different. Having two separate locations for calculations to be performed is completely different then having two separate parsers with incompatibilities between them in the underlying interfaces. TW Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Improved change of integer base - Angus - 02-24-2014, 12:12 PM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Tugdual - 02-24-2014, 02:38 PM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Stefan - 02-24-2014, 03:20 PM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Stefan - 02-24-2014, 06:59 PM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Angus - 03-01-2014, 10:22 AM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Terje Vallestad - 03-01-2014, 11:50 AM
RE: Improved change of integer base - massimo - 03-01-2014, 06:30 PM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Angus - 03-01-2014, 07:17 PM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Tim Wessman - 03-01-2014 07:30 PM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Angus - 03-01-2014, 09:47 PM
RE: Improved change of integer base - Angus - 03-02-2014, 04:27 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)