1,024 additional Registers on the CL

[Ángel Martin]

(08-07-2016 12:00 AM)Paul Dale Wrote:  

(08-06-2016 11:26 PM)Den Belillo (Martinez Ca.) Wrote:  It should be as do-able as any other coordinate pair (or x,y,z - or x,y,z, with descriptor) storage-retrieval scheme.

Without indirect addressing it will be rather tricky
Pauli

ok, let's take the gauntlet and implement the INDirect addressing then, which will need to use a different implementation scheme than the native does: X-addresses go from 4FF up to 7FF, thus using the "80" mask won't work without mods. I could still use that mask and check for "08x" in S&X, but i suspect it'll be easier using an "800" mask and simply check for the XS digit.... yeah, that should work and be relatively approachable. Satay tuned!