Landscape vs Portrait
|
08-30-2016, 12:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-30-2016 12:30 AM by emece67.)
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Landscape vs Portrait
(08-29-2016 04:41 PM)Logan Wrote: This is interesting. I assumed everyone picked up their calculators and used thumbs. I repeated this test and, after training, I've found no differences in speed between a portrait machine (34S) and a landscape one (15C, well in fact a DM15L), no matter if I only use my right finger or both thumbs (always 6 seconds). Both machines require the same number of keystrokes. I'm not a big user of the 2-thumbs mode, though (surely a matter of age). With a 41C I was faster (5 seconds), but this machine does not require a shift to compute the ln. Until recently, I always used portrait machines, but after buying, and using, some landscape ones, I definitely prefer this layout for desk use. In my case, they use to fit better in a cluttered desk than a portrait one. For handheld use I do not have a clear winner. Regards. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)