Post Reply 
Solved: what is wrong with this LatLong->Distance code? A Trigonometry "feature".
10-14-2016, 09:53 AM
Post: #8
RE: Can you see what is wrong with this LatLong->Distance code? Trigonometry bug?
(10-13-2016 05:31 PM)Tim Wessman Wrote:  .

Anyway, I think you have your answer about the bug. If you want to be completely independent of your setting, run HMS-> (doesn't matter if you are are in HMS or not, just sets the flag on the real number input) then D->R.


I'm wondering now though if HMS-> and ->HMS should also handle angular unit objects directly so something like ->HMS(1.5_rad) would return 85°56′37.20937″ ... thoughts anyone?

Contrary to my previous statement, with a question mark though, I would no longer consider this to be a bug. In my opinion it is a feature, perhaps needs to be stated clearer somewhere! But where? And a, yet to be implemented, D->R command should work regardless of DMS or HR format, avoiding these ambiguities.

And I think your proposal for ->HMS () would be valuable enhancement.

Günter

Don't forget to implement newRPL Smile
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Can you see what is wrong with this LatLong->Distance code? Trigonometry bug? - Guenter Schink - 10-14-2016 09:53 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)