Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637)
|
01-11-2017, 06:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2017 07:03 PM by Tim Wessman.)
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637)
Only when you are in radians mode, else it probably returns pi/4-45deg which is a bug in the TI methodology. What happens when you try it in degree/grads? Is that consistent with the behavior you are requesting?
Can you try .735398...-45deg? Why doesn't it assume that is a numerical radian value in this case? Why should the system *assume* that plain untagged number is an angular value, let alone radians? I'm fine to make changes with good reason, but simply "TI does it that way" is not really a good reason. TW Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637) - slawek39 - 01-11-2017, 05:05 PM
RE: Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637) - Tim Wessman - 01-11-2017, 06:43 PM
RE: Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637) - slawek39 - 01-11-2017, 06:49 PM
RE: Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637) - Tim Wessman - 01-11-2017 06:56 PM
RE: Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637) - Claudio L. - 01-11-2017, 07:46 PM
RE: Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637) - Tim Wessman - 01-11-2017, 08:20 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)