Post Reply 
Your Opinion about Jean-Marc Baillard's RNGs
02-26-2017, 06:51 AM
Post: #2
RE: Your Opinion about Jean-Marc Baillard's RNGs
Just looking quickly leads me to guess that program #2 is best. Which number to use for the multiplier depends on the continued fraction expansion of that multiplier and 9,999,999,967. One with smaller partial quotients will generally be better.

Program #1 isn't too bad; the multiplier (9821 in this case) seems designed to give the longest period modulo a power of 10. Again, one should choose a pair with a continued fraction expansion with small partial quotients.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Your Opinion about Jean-Marc Baillard's RNGs - ttw - 02-26-2017 06:51 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)