Post Reply 
HP-92 Simulation Attempt
05-21-2017, 03:42 AM
Post: #8
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt
[/quote]

Hi Bob,

Still scratching my head :-)

From page 87, example 1 of HP92 Investor Apps Manual...

Semi annual
30/360 basis
Issue date = JUL 6, 1976
Settlement = AUG 23, 1976 (47 days)
Maturity = DEC 20, 1976 (117 days)

My guesses...
Issue date = start of coupon period
End of coupon period = 180 - (47 + 117) = 16 days after maturity
E (seems) to be days between Issue and Maturity (164 days)

Using the HP-92 to manually key in the calculation on 113 of HP-92 manual, I get an answer of 100.036. (Rounded = 100.34) The manual states an answer of 100.03

There is a small discrepancy which I cannot account for, which could mean the method I am using is still in error.

I think I have the accrued interest calculations working now for both 30/360 and actual/360.

cheers

Tony
[/quote]

Hi Tony,

Using my HP-80, I also get 100.03.

This one is not a bond, so the characteristics would be a little different. It's a certificate of deposit or a short term note. Issue date is July 6, 1976, and the end of the coupon period in this case I believe would be the maturity date, since this is not a true bond.

I tend to agree with you that E would likely be the number of days between Issue and Maturity.

On my HP-80, when I entered the settle date and maturity date, there was no 30/360 option given as with later calculators, so I only got 119, which is the calendar days, then I entered the yield as "i" and the coupon of 5.80 as "PMT" and pressed shift-Bond and still got the same result as in the 92 book. I don't know if the number of days got changed when i pressed shift "Bond". But certainly in the instructions for the illustration given here for HP-92 it stated clearly to set the day basis to 360. In the tape in the illustration I see 0.77 AI and later 0.76 AI, which I'm sure is accrued interest, but I am wondering why they show two amounts that differ by a penny. OK, it must be 0.76 on a 30/360 basis and 0.77 on a calendar day basis.

I don't know if any of these could account for the difference you're getting, but you might try them.


Regards,
Bob
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-15-2017, 03:18 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - bshoring - 05-15-2017, 05:21 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-16-2017, 12:28 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - bshoring - 05-17-2017, 09:45 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-18-2017, 11:05 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-21-2017, 01:58 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-21-2017, 02:01 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - bshoring - 05-21-2017 03:42 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-21-2017, 04:57 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-23-2017, 11:58 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - PANAMATIK - 05-23-2017, 11:41 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-27-2017, 04:00 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - bshoring - 05-29-2017, 03:47 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-29-2017, 08:04 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - PANAMATIK - 05-29-2017, 12:38 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 05-29-2017, 01:37 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - PANAMATIK - 06-02-2017, 02:52 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 06-02-2017, 11:49 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - PANAMATIK - 07-02-2017, 09:26 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 07-03-2017, 02:35 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 07-06-2017, 06:15 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 06-06-2017, 11:34 PM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 06-20-2017, 01:00 AM
RE: HP-92 Simulation Attempt - teenix - 06-22-2017, 05:56 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)