SR-52 was a giant leap. How?
|
06-18-2017, 10:23 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How?
Yeah. Thanks to Viktor Toth & Joerg's sites as well as numerous memorable visits to Computique, Freeway Stores, Olympic Sales, and Tams, I have most of those brochures.
I recall the illustration on the back pages of the charts in black, yellow, and orange comparing a keystroke approach to this example-- 1+3x[4+5/(7-2/9)]. As an inadequate representation, TI just filled the RPN stack with the first four variables of the sample equation. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Matt Agajanian - 06-17-2017, 12:12 AM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Matt Agajanian - 06-17-2017, 12:20 AM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Chasfield - 06-17-2017, 12:21 PM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Matt Agajanian - 06-17-2017, 05:10 PM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - toml_12953 - 06-18-2017, 01:49 AM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Matt Agajanian - 06-18-2017 10:23 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)