Post Reply 
A bug in the CAS
07-09-2017, 04:12 PM
Post: #11
RE: A bug in the CAS
This is almost correct, more precisely if you set simplification to none, you'll see that a[2,2] last two elements (parametric and cartesian equations) are undefined, but the intersection solver was solving with undef anyway. I have now fixed that.
For assumptions, parametric assumptions are not supported.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
A bug in the CAS - wangchong01 - 07-08-2017, 03:57 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - Arno K - 07-08-2017, 06:23 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - Freire - 07-08-2017, 07:33 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - Arno K - 07-08-2017, 08:58 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - wangchong01 - 07-09-2017, 02:50 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - parisse - 07-08-2017, 07:53 PM
RE: A bug in the CAS - Freire - 07-09-2017, 06:03 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - Arno K - 07-09-2017, 06:27 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - parisse - 07-09-2017, 07:03 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - wangchong01 - 07-09-2017, 07:42 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - parisse - 07-09-2017 04:12 PM
RE: A bug in the CAS - webmasterpdx - 07-10-2017, 04:34 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - parisse - 07-10-2017, 07:48 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - fhub - 07-10-2017, 10:56 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - parisse - 07-11-2017, 12:59 PM
RE: A bug in the CAS - wangchong01 - 07-29-2017, 06:52 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - DrD - 07-29-2017, 10:11 AM
RE: A bug in the CAS - parisse - 07-29-2017, 11:53 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)