HP 49G, 49g+ & 50g: Built-in Zints
|
09-01-2017, 10:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2017 10:23 PM by Joe Horn.)
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP 49G, 49g+ & 50g: Built-in Zints
I can confirm Gerald's surprising timings. Consider this program:
<< 1. 10000. START 3 DROP NEXT >> If it is compiled as usual, using an ordinary short-form 3, hex 273CE, it runs in 14.14 seconds, but if compiled with a long-form zint (which is what ZINT 3 would compile to), hex 030000702614, it runs in 14.7 seconds. So short-form zints are faster than long form zints. I would LOVE to hear an explanation for that, since Christoph's argument to the contrary makes sense to me. <0|ΙΈ|0> -Joe- |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)