Integration methods...an error-proof method?
|
09-02-2017, 11:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-02-2017 11:14 PM by Joe Horn.)
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method?
(09-02-2017 10:43 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote: Thanks. As I do not have a 71B, is there a port to the 67 or 41? The HP-41 PPC ROM contains a routine called IG (InteGrate) which uses a modified Romberg, similar to the HP-71's Math Pac. Its code and some commentary can be found here: https://coertvonk.com/technology/hp41/integrate-4625 There are a few other implementations of Romberg for the HP-41 here: http://www.hpmuseum.org/software/41/41rombrg.htm There are a BUNCH of various integration programs for the HP-41 in the "Differentiation & Integration" section of this page: http://hp41programs.yolasite.com/ (09-02-2017 10:43 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote: Also, how does this algorithm differ from the Romberg Integration program found in the program from the Math/Utilities module for TI-58/59? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller? <0|ΙΈ|0> -Joe- |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Matt Agajanian - 09-02-2017, 09:42 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Joe Horn - 09-02-2017, 10:21 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Matt Agajanian - 09-02-2017, 10:43 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Joe Horn - 09-02-2017 11:05 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017, 02:47 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Paul Dale - 09-03-2017, 04:09 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017, 05:24 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Paul Dale - 09-03-2017, 06:30 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017, 08:07 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)