Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67
|
09-03-2017, 05:44 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67
(09-03-2017 05:32 PM)Dieter Wrote:(09-03-2017 05:18 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote: Thank you for this. To be honest, the HP-41 module option seems to imply that 41 x-Functions be present or perhaps the 41CX was needed. My goof. After I posted this, I realised that it's the Romberg Integration program from 41's Advantage module I was referring to. But, I seem to recall that the Romberg application requires a certain other module to be in the 41 to function properly. Or did I misread something? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67 - Matt Agajanian - 09-02-2017, 07:02 PM
RE: Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67 - Dieter - 09-03-2017, 08:27 AM
RE: Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67 - Matt Agajanian - 09-03-2017, 05:18 PM
RE: Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67 - Dieter - 09-03-2017, 05:32 PM
RE: Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67 - Matt Agajanian - 09-03-2017 05:44 PM
RE: Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67 - Dieter - 09-03-2017, 05:59 PM
RE: Trapezoidal Rule for HP-67 - Matt Agajanian - 09-03-2017, 06:04 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)