program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G
|
09-30-2017, 02:50 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G
Hi,
I've been working on porting a program that I wrote for the HP48SX to the other 48/49/50G calculators and noticed some strange behavior running the program as a library from the non hp48SX calculator models. The main issue is when the program is run as a library on the G series calcs execution time slows down drastically opposed to running the program as a variable or as a library on the 48SX. I tracked down the slowdown of the program to the execution of the 'MEM' command. I tried using the SYSRPL version of the command that doesn't force GC and the program ran at normal speed but the memory reported was no longer accurate. I find it odd that the program runs at normal speed when the variable form of the program is executed, but has trouble being run as a library. Can anyone shed light on what might be causing this? Any work around for executing MEM from a library program without a major slowdown? Any insight on to what causes this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Scott |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - snrowe - 09-30-2017 02:50 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - cyrille de brébisson - 10-02-2017, 05:48 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - snrowe - 10-03-2017, 01:05 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - DavidM - 10-02-2017, 05:15 PM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - snrowe - 10-03-2017, 01:50 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - DavidM - 10-03-2017, 03:16 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - cyrille de brébisson - 10-03-2017, 04:44 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - Software49g - 10-03-2017, 10:22 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)