program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G
|
10-03-2017, 01:05 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G
(10-02-2017 05:48 AM)cyrille de brébisson Wrote: Hello, It was in port 3 on card 2. I just confirmed that it runs at normal speed from port 1 and 0 so it must be GC run from a covered port is much slower than a non covered port. I had a loop that was displaying the time and free mem every loop, I could see the clock tick every second when running from the uncovered port and every ~5 seconds from the covered port. Don't have my hp50G and 49G with me now but I'll try all the ports with those as well later this week. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Scott |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - snrowe - 09-30-2017, 02:50 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - cyrille de brébisson - 10-02-2017, 05:48 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - snrowe - 10-03-2017 01:05 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - DavidM - 10-02-2017, 05:15 PM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - snrowe - 10-03-2017, 01:50 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - DavidM - 10-03-2017, 03:16 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - cyrille de brébisson - 10-03-2017, 04:44 AM
RE: program execution speed as library vs variable HP50G - Software49g - 10-03-2017, 10:22 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)