Post Reply 
trig representation
10-08-2017, 11:15 AM (This post was last modified: 10-08-2017 01:11 PM by DrD.)
Post: #6
RE: trig representation
The original integral:
calculator:=int(x*sec(x^2),x);

Substitution:
let u=x^2; then:
du=2xdx
dx=du/2x

The integral becomes:
(1/2)*∫(x*sec(u),u)
oopsie correction: (1/2)*∫(sec(u),u) my copy and paste error, sorry! Thanks Arno!

pencil:=1/2)*ln(ABS(sec(x^2)+tan(x^2)));

Parisse suggested:
Quote:The best way to check a result obtained by hand with the calc answer is check if simplify of the difference returns 0.

calculator-pencil ≠0
(calculator==pencil) ==> 0, false


This test fails, as does the equivalence operators. Taking the difference, simplified or not, between the calculator result, and the manual result, isn't zero. affirm({calculator, pencil})?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
trig representation - DrD - 10-06-2017, 11:19 AM
RE: trig representation - parisse - 10-06-2017, 03:43 PM
RE: trig representation - DrD - 10-07-2017, 11:05 AM
RE: trig representation - Arno K - 10-07-2017, 02:14 PM
RE: trig representation - parisse - 10-07-2017, 06:10 PM
RE: trig representation - DrD - 10-08-2017 11:15 AM
RE: trig representation - Arno K - 10-08-2017, 11:46 AM
RE: trig representation - parisse - 10-08-2017, 12:06 PM
RE: trig representation - DrD - 10-08-2017, 01:40 PM
RE: trig representation - toml_12953 - 10-10-2017, 02:33 PM
RE: trig representation - Tim Wessman - 10-10-2017, 04:13 PM
RE: trig representation - DrD - 10-10-2017, 07:43 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)