trig representation
|
10-08-2017, 11:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-08-2017 01:11 PM by DrD.)
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: trig representation
The original integral:
calculator:=int(x*sec(x^2),x); Substitution: let u=x^2; then: du=2xdx dx=du/2x The integral becomes: (1/2)*∫(x*sec(u),u) oopsie correction: (1/2)*∫(sec(u),u) my copy and paste error, sorry! Thanks Arno! pencil:=1/2)*ln(ABS(sec(x^2)+tan(x^2))); Parisse suggested: Quote:The best way to check a result obtained by hand with the calc answer is check if simplify of the difference returns 0. calculator-pencil ≠0 (calculator==pencil) ==> 0, false This test fails, as does the equivalence operators. Taking the difference, simplified or not, between the calculator result, and the manual result, isn't zero. affirm({calculator, pencil})? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
trig representation - DrD - 10-06-2017, 11:19 AM
RE: trig representation - parisse - 10-06-2017, 03:43 PM
RE: trig representation - DrD - 10-07-2017, 11:05 AM
RE: trig representation - Arno K - 10-07-2017, 02:14 PM
RE: trig representation - parisse - 10-07-2017, 06:10 PM
RE: trig representation - DrD - 10-08-2017 11:15 AM
RE: trig representation - Arno K - 10-08-2017, 11:46 AM
RE: trig representation - parisse - 10-08-2017, 12:06 PM
RE: trig representation - DrD - 10-08-2017, 01:40 PM
RE: trig representation - toml_12953 - 10-10-2017, 02:33 PM
RE: trig representation - Tim Wessman - 10-10-2017, 04:13 PM
RE: trig representation - DrD - 10-10-2017, 07:43 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)