RPN Question
|
10-29-2017, 09:42 PM
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
RE: RPN Question
(10-29-2017 07:44 AM)Dieter Wrote: Note that this method may cause roundoff errors: 7 → 3,499999999. I believe we have found machine epsilon for the 41, 1x10^-9. Since HP could have achieved a smaller epsilon if they had used binary vs. bcd format in the HP-41, there must have been some other tradeoff or legacy design that led them to use BCD. Try CC41! |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
RPN Question - Gamo - 10-25-2017, 11:11 AM
RE: RPN Question - Paul Dale - 10-25-2017, 12:10 PM
RE: RPN Question - Gerson W. Barbosa - 10-25-2017, 12:29 PM
RE: RPN Question - jebem - 10-25-2017, 01:05 PM
RE: RPN Question - Gerson W. Barbosa - 10-25-2017, 01:33 PM
RE: RPN Question - emece67 - 10-25-2017, 02:21 PM
RE: RPN Question - Craig Bladow - 10-25-2017, 06:32 PM
RE: RPN Question - Craig Bladow - 10-29-2017, 02:43 AM
RE: RPN Question - Dieter - 10-29-2017, 07:44 AM
RE: RPN Question - Craig Bladow - 10-29-2017 09:42 PM
RE: RPN Question - Dieter - 10-25-2017, 08:59 PM
RE: RPN Question - Paul Dale - 10-25-2017, 12:43 PM
RE: RPN Question - Didier Lachieze - 10-25-2017, 01:10 PM
RE: RPN Question - Gerson W. Barbosa - 10-25-2017, 01:37 PM
RE: RPN Question - Gamo - 10-25-2017, 01:54 PM
RE: RPN Question - Mark Hardman - 10-29-2017, 09:47 PM
RE: RPN Question - rprosperi - 10-29-2017, 11:49 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)