Elliptic integrals
|
11-03-2017, 03:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2017 03:48 PM by salvomic.)
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Elliptic integrals
(11-03-2017 01:54 PM)AlexFekken Wrote: In the first pair of calculations you are integrating over a singularity at the end of the integration internval when you use the non-trig defiinition (i.e. at x=t=1). The trig version does not have that singularity. So I suspect that the integration algorithm gives you a less accurate result because of that singularity, i.e. it is not so good at guessing the limit of the improper Riemann integral. thank you for the explaining, Alex. Yes, I left the first pair in non trig definition for studying purpose, as they are well know in this form, however you are right: so there is a singularity to avoid (and in effect the Prime gives also a message first to calculate). Surely the code could be stronger, but I'd not want to pass at trig-form for the 1st pair, for now... Salvo ∫aL√0mic (IT9CLU) :: HP Prime 50g 41CX 71b 42s 39s 35s 12C 15C - DM42, DM41X - WP34s Prime Soft. Lib |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Elliptic integrals - salvomic - 11-01-2017, 10:00 AM
RE: Elliptic integrals - salvomic - 11-02-2017, 05:42 PM
RE: Elliptic integrals - AlexFekken - 11-03-2017, 01:54 PM
RE: Elliptic integrals - salvomic - 11-03-2017 03:41 PM
RE: Elliptic integrals - Eddie W. Shore - 11-07-2017, 12:51 PM
RE: Elliptic integrals - salvomic - 11-07-2017, 01:30 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)