Which calculators had no known bugs?
|
11-13-2017, 11:13 PM
Post: #38
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Which calculators had no known bugs?
(08-05-2017 04:51 PM)Sadsilence Wrote: Of course you are right and it has to do with internal precision and formula used for all exponantial calculations. But 2^x values are so common to programmers and so easy to handle for processors of all kinds, that I somehow expected a special treatment. Gene: Life is short and ROM is full. On a semi-more serious note, I'm always amazed that so many things worked as well as they did. The **short** bug lists on these older models is a fabulous achievement. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)