Post Reply 
HP 49G / HP 50G memory
11-19-2017, 01:37 AM (This post was last modified: 11-19-2017 01:43 AM by TravisE.)
Post: #7
RE: HP 49G / HP 50G memory
One incidental thing I've noticed about storing and running libraries I've written in Port 1 vs. other ports is that there is often a bit of flickering “snow” on the screen at times if they run from Port 1, whereas I don't notice this effect if they run from Port 2 or Port 0.

Oddly enough, despite what was said above, it seems that in some of my informal tests, programs from libraries stored in Port 1 appear to run slightly slower on my 50g than from Port 2. For instance, I tried executing a loop that repeatedly called a short UserRPL program I had stored in a library; with the library in Port 1, I got fewer average executions per second than in Port 2, and in Port 2 I got fewer executions per second than I got with the library in Port 0. However, the increase in performance from Port 1 to Port 2, or from Port 2 to Port 0, was only on the order of around 3 to 5 percent or so.

However, in my case these were quick tests that I didn't perform too terribly rigorously, so it's possible there are several variables I didn't account for.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
HP 49G / HP 50G memory - groskwik - 11-15-2017, 06:54 PM
RE: HP 49G / HP 50G memory - DavidM - 11-16-2017, 03:41 PM
RE: HP 49G / HP 50G memory - Han - 11-17-2017, 04:14 PM
RE: HP 49G / HP 50G memory - Joe Horn - 11-18-2017, 05:46 AM
RE: HP 49G / HP 50G memory - DavidM - 11-18-2017, 03:32 PM
RE: HP 49G / HP 50G memory - pier4r - 11-18-2017, 09:50 AM
RE: HP 49G / HP 50G memory - TravisE - 11-19-2017 01:37 AM
RE: HP 49G / HP 50G memory - DavidM - 11-19-2017, 04:22 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)