Post Reply 
RPN/RPL is still relevant
04-08-2014, 06:07 AM (This post was last modified: 04-08-2014 06:09 AM by Mike Morrow.)
Post: #2
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant
(04-08-2014 12:44 AM)Matt Agajanian Wrote:  As a calculator collector, programmer, enthusiast, etc for 42 years...

Wow! That takes you back to an era just before the HP-35 (equivalent cost $2300 in 2014) appeared, when even the four-function Bomar 901B cost the 2014 equivalent of $800. Impressive...unless you were very wealthy! :-)

I was a junior in electrical engineering at Georgia Tech in 1972, and that Bomar 901B was all I could afford. Well...in truth...I really could not afford it

With respect to the topic...Casio's V.P.A.M. (Visually Perfect Algebraic Method) is one of the best algebraic entry and display methods I've ever come across...in my 42 years. You can enjoy its use in the fx-115ES Plus sold at every Walmart for less than $18. Its Gauss-Kronrod numerical integration function is better than anything from TI or HP, AFAIK. Here is the fx-115ES Plus Manual.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RPN/RPL is still relevant - Matt Agajanian - 04-08-2014, 12:44 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Mike Morrow - 04-08-2014 06:07 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-08-2014, 11:08 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-08-2014, 07:37 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-10-2014, 07:31 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - CR Haeger - 04-10-2014, 04:29 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 06:54 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-10-2014, 10:20 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Alvaro - 04-10-2014, 06:46 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 07:00 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 07:20 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 30 Guest(s)