RPN/RPL is still relevant

[Mike Morrow]

(04-08-2014 05:14 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote:  ...the V.P.A.M. interface does have a somewhat shallow complexity to its usability, meaning the math typesetting on this one is fairly straightforward, much like the 48 onward.

I'm not sure what "somewhat shallow complexity to its usability" means, even though the following clause purports to explain...does "on this one" refer to a fx-115ES Plus?
Does your statement actually mean "VPAM is less complex for algebraic entry of a specific task" than are other algebraic systems? If so, I think we agree...in that case your at first glance disparaging term "somewhat shallow complexity" is a <b>positive attribute</b>! :-)

I challenge anyone to cite a current calculator that sells for $13 to $18 (US) which has an algebraic entry and display interface as natural and powerful as Casio's VPAM.