Post Reply 
RPN/RPL is still relevant
04-08-2014, 07:35 PM (This post was last modified: 04-08-2014 08:01 PM by Matt Agajanian.)
Post: #8
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant
(04-08-2014 07:04 PM)Mike Morrow Wrote:  
(04-08-2014 11:08 AM)HP67 Wrote:  I was intested in the 115/991 ES Plus after reading Eddie Shore's excellent blog, but another poster here, Stefan, pointed out some shortcomings of the 115/991 in another thread.

You were done a disservice!!! :-) I have never come across a machine even remotely as capable for the price as is the fx-115ES Plus (here...mechanical calc user since 1969, electronic calc user since 1972). If only it were programmable! It's so extremely low priced, there's no excuse for any calculator nut to not buy and try!

I concur. For its under $25 tag, the 115es Plus is well populated with not only advanced statistics but even more advanced calculus functionality than the pocket-change price would suggest. I must say, between the 36X Pro, EL-W516X and 115ES Plus, Casio's model does provide more bang for the buck!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RPN/RPL is still relevant - Matt Agajanian - 04-08-2014, 12:44 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-08-2014, 11:08 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Matt Agajanian - 04-08-2014 07:35 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-08-2014, 07:37 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-10-2014, 07:31 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - CR Haeger - 04-10-2014, 04:29 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 06:54 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-10-2014, 10:20 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Alvaro - 04-10-2014, 06:46 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 07:00 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 07:20 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)