SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency
|
12-21-2017, 02:59 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency
Hi there.
Even as TI’s technology was robust, could they have developed and fully-merged keycodes even as early as the SR-52/56 generation? Also, by the time the TI-58/58C/59 was introduced, I’m certain TI could’ve implemented a multi-keystroke fully-merged system. Besides, since SR-52 mag cards were incompatable, why didn’t TI use fully-merged keystrokes for the 58/59? I could see, if SR-52 mag cards were compatable, the keycode structure would need to remain identical. But, since there was no backward-compatability, why did TI hold to such a memory-hungry keycode system? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-21-2017 02:59 AM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-23-2017, 05:30 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - badaze - 12-23-2017, 09:45 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017, 07:37 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Gene - 12-23-2017, 08:26 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017, 08:32 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-23-2017, 09:29 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Gene - 12-23-2017, 10:14 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-25-2017, 02:13 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017, 10:36 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)