SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency
|
12-23-2017, 07:37 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency
Thank Dieter.
Yes, before I sent the original post, that’s what I thought—since the simpler TI-57 incorporated the merged keystrokes, why couldn’t the same be implemented in the 58/59. Alluding to an earlier post from (I think PANAMATIK) where several OP Code charts for Woodstock and HP-67/97 OP Codes were shown, I did not realize that even TI’s models were under a 256-bit constraint. Thus, I can now more clearly understand the limitations. Now that you I am aware of these, TI-58/59 programming structures seem more powerful than I originally thought. Thanks |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-21-2017, 02:59 AM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-23-2017, 05:30 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - badaze - 12-23-2017, 09:45 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017 07:37 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Gene - 12-23-2017, 08:26 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017, 08:32 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-23-2017, 09:29 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Gene - 12-23-2017, 10:14 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-25-2017, 02:13 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017, 10:36 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)