SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency
|
12-23-2017, 08:26 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency
Marketing might be another reason.
As it was, the TI58/59 had 480 or 960 steps. Merged, the number would have been **lower** and less of a way to appear > HP. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-21-2017, 02:59 AM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-23-2017, 05:30 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - badaze - 12-23-2017, 09:45 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017, 07:37 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Gene - 12-23-2017 08:26 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017, 08:32 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-23-2017, 09:29 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Gene - 12-23-2017, 10:14 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Dieter - 12-25-2017, 02:13 PM
RE: SR-52->HP-67 Keycodes efficiency - Matt Agajanian - 12-23-2017, 10:36 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)