Post Reply 
RPN/RPL is still relevant
04-10-2014, 10:06 AM
Post: #16
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant
(04-10-2014 07:31 AM)HP67 Wrote:  That's what Emacs is for, anyway.
Ah! Talking about Emacs: Another example for a superior product w/o any chance for the mass market. Even on Win I'm using Jasspa's MicroEmacs just for the powerful keyboard macro functionality. Still unbeaten by Textpad, Notepad++ etc, it does multiple searches within macros, allowing for highly configurable replacement operations that saved me lots of hours writing scripts or doing things manually.

RPN plays in the same league. Powerful but not attractive to people used to swim in the mainstream.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RPN/RPL is still relevant - Matt Agajanian - 04-08-2014, 12:44 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-08-2014, 11:08 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-08-2014, 07:37 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-10-2014, 07:31 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Thomas Radtke - 04-10-2014 10:06 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - CR Haeger - 04-10-2014, 04:29 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 06:54 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - HP67 - 04-10-2014, 10:20 AM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Alvaro - 04-10-2014, 06:46 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 07:00 PM
RE: RPN/RPL is still relevant - Han - 04-10-2014, 07:20 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)