The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action
|
01-11-2018, 02:33 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action
(01-10-2018 07:47 AM)salvomic Wrote: Is it 1457/536? No. You're supposed to take the SMALLER of the two first-differing numbers in the dfc output (in this case, 4) and add 1 to that. Like this: It seems that you may have been looking for where the decimal expansions of the inputs begin to differ. Don't do that. Look instead at the outputs of dfc and see where THOSE begin to differ. The entire algorithm is illustrated in the above screen shot. The decimal expansions have nothing to do with it. <0|ΙΈ|0> -Joe- |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - Joe Horn - 01-10-2018, 01:37 AM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - salvomic - 01-10-2018, 07:47 AM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - Joe Horn - 01-11-2018 02:33 AM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - salvomic - 01-11-2018, 07:23 AM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - DrD - 01-10-2018, 02:07 PM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - Joe Horn - 07-10-2018, 06:47 AM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - Didier Lachieze - 07-10-2018, 08:30 AM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - Joe Horn - 07-10-2018, 05:09 PM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - webmasterpdx - 01-11-2018, 05:55 AM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - Joe Horn - 07-10-2018, 06:42 PM
RE: The new dfc and dfc2f functions in action - Joe Horn - 07-30-2018, 04:44 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)