(48/49/50) LSORT v0.6b

[John Keith]

(02-02-2018 08:01 AM)Werner Wrote:  Thanks John - I wasn't aware of that. After all these years, I still discover new things.
I'll add it to the 'unresolvable differences', since there's no way I can incorporate that as it is.
For me to solve this (and integrate units as well, which pose a similar problem), the program has to be 100% rewritten, will be a lot larger, use more memory, and be somewhat slower.

Cheers, Werner

Don't worry, I'm not complaining- one can use I\->R or R\->I first and LSORT is still zillions of times faster than the built-in SORT. Thanks again for all your efforts.

John