NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks
|
05-05-2018, 06:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-05-2018 07:00 AM by grsbanks.)
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks
(05-04-2018 10:12 PM)John Keith Wrote: Actually, there are other more subtle differences in chemistry between NiCd and NiMH batteries. Long-term "float" charging, e.g. leaving calculator connected to charger after batteries are fully charged, will eventually damage NiMHs. NiCds on the other hand are not damaged by long-term unregulated charging unless the current is excessively high. Hence trickle-charging NiMH batteries once they're full. This said, the capacity of NiCd batteries of the day was roughly 450mAh and you're supposed to charge them at 1/10 charge capacity for 12 hours, so 45mA for 12 hours. By the time NiMH came on the scene, capacities had improved somewhat and NiMH can be charged at a much higher rate anyway. Surely the 45mA that a charger designed for period NiCd cells spits out is barely trickle-charging the NiMH cell, meaning that there's little to worry about regarding over-charging anyway, right? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - rolfmwa - 05-04-2018, 10:25 AM
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - Zaphod - 05-04-2018, 12:14 PM
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - Dieter - 05-04-2018, 12:28 PM
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - John Keith - 05-04-2018, 10:12 PM
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - grsbanks - 05-05-2018 06:50 AM
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - Dieter - 05-05-2018, 05:37 PM
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - Dieter - 05-04-2018, 12:25 PM
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - burkhard - 05-04-2018, 05:40 PM
RE: NiCAD vs. NiMH Batteries in Woodstocks - rolfmwa - 05-04-2018, 08:02 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)