No RPL?
|
12-17-2013, 04:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-17-2013 05:01 AM by Kevin Ouellet.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: No RPL?
I don't mind HP PPL, but again that's coming from someone who used BASIC-like languages for over a decade. I am annoyed at the BEGIN/END syntax sometimes, though. I think HP PPL is good in the way that beginner programmers will be able to get into programming easier, while not getting limited by atrociously slow speed like on TI or especially Casio calcs. Just see how slow the Casio FX-cp400 is. HP PPL is the only BASIC-like language for calculators that can rival TI-Z80/68K ASM.
I'm happy that finally, there is a TI-BASIC-like language that runs at reasonable speed. We no longer have to rely on assembly to make programs that runs at more than 3 frames per second. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
No RPL? - John R. Graham - 12-16-2013, 07:10 PM
RE: No RPL? - bhtooefr - 12-16-2013, 08:24 PM
RE: No RPL? - Kevin Ouellet - 12-16-2013, 08:41 PM
RE: No RPL? - jgreenb2 - 12-16-2013, 11:13 PM
RE: No RPL? - Han - 12-16-2013, 11:42 PM
RE: No RPL? - jgreenb2 - 12-17-2013, 01:55 AM
RE: No RPL? - Joe Horn - 12-17-2013, 10:26 AM
RE: No RPL? - Tim Wessman - 12-17-2013, 02:30 AM
RE: No RPL? - eried - 12-17-2013, 02:47 AM
RE: No RPL? - Kevin Ouellet - 12-17-2013 04:59 AM
RE: No RPL? - jgreenb2 - 12-17-2013, 05:03 PM
RE: No RPL? - Han - 12-19-2013, 02:15 AM
RE: No RPL? - Michael de Estrada - 12-19-2013, 02:52 AM
RE: No RPL? - Han - 12-19-2013, 03:25 AM
RE: No RPL? - Thomas Klemm - 12-19-2013, 01:40 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)