Post Reply 
The case of the disappearing angle units, or "the dangle of the angle"
07-31-2019, 07:34 PM (This post was last modified: 07-31-2019 07:45 PM by ijabbott.)
Post: #1
The case of the disappearing angle units, or "the dangle of the angle"
I know angles are technically dimensionless, but lots of people like to give them units nonetheless. This leads to situations where the units magically disappear or reappear unless extra steps are taken.

Consider the following examples (images shamelessly borrowed from mathsisfun.com)...

Area of a sector of a circle

[Image: circle-sector-area.svg]

\(A=\theta \cdot \frac{r^2}{2} \)

(for \(\theta\) in radians). To make the math work when angles have units, the above expression for area technically needs to be divided by 1 radian:

\(A=\frac{\theta}{1\,\textrm{rad}} \cdot \frac{r^2}{2} \)

Area of a segment of a circle

[Image: circle-segment-area.svg]

\(A=(\theta - \sin{\theta})\cdot\frac{r^2}{2}\)

That's different - we have an angle (in radians) minus its sine. To make that work, we need to divide the plain angle by 1 radian:

\(A=(\frac{\theta}{1\,\textrm{rad}}-\sin{\theta})\cdot\frac{r^2}{2}\)

Arc length of a sector of a circle

[Image: circle-arc-length.svg]

\(L = \theta \cdot r\)

Again, we need to divide the angle by 1 radian to get rid of the angular units:

\(L = \frac{\theta}{1\,\textrm{rad}} \cdot r \)

Question

Is it better to ignore angular units and just treat angles as plain old numbers (as long as an angle of 1 corresponds to 1 radian), or does the angular aspect have some cosmic significance that shouldn't be casually discarded? I guess this is more of a philosophical question, inspired by the way the WP-43S project plans to handle angles.

— Ian Abbott
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
The case of the disappearing angle units, or "the dangle of the angle" - ijabbott - 07-31-2019 07:34 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)