Post Reply 
HP-29C: 98 Program Steps, So, why not an even 100?
08-31-2019, 04:52 PM
Post: #22
RE: HP-29C: 98 Program Steps, So, why not an even 100?
(08-27-2019 11:18 PM)striegel Wrote:  
(08-26-2019 07:21 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote:  ... the SR-56 had a 100 step program memory, why was the 29C program memory 98 steps?
...
The HP programming model was more efficient due to RPN and merging steps. e.g. STO 0 on an HP was one step vs. two steps for the TI model.

I agree on all points. It’s impressive that HP was able to develop and implement fully merged keystrokes after the Classics lineage.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: HP-29C: 98 Program Steps, So, why not an even 100? - Matt Agajanian - 08-31-2019 04:52 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)