HP50G : TRN vs TRAN
05-09-2021, 10:35 PM
Post: #9
 Gil Senior Member Posts: 637 Joined: Oct 2019
RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN
Say X is the following Matrix:

[[ 1 6.35676254625 ]
[ 1 6.35675231425 ]
[ 1 6.3567482106 ]
[ 1 6.3567338557 ]],

without dots (.) after the ones.

Try a):
X TRAN X *

You get
[[ 4 25.4269969268 ]
[ 25.4269969268 161.633043179 ]]
(no dot after the 4).

Now try b):
X TRN X

You get apparently the same result:
[[ 4. 25.4269969268 ]
[ 25.4269969268 161.633043179 ]]
(but with a dot after the 4 => approximate mode).

Now try a2) :
X TRAN X * INV
YOU get
[[ 321639766412. -50598152402.8 ]
[ -50761421319.8 7985437126.68 ]]

Now try b2) :
X TRN X * INV
YOU get
[[ 322677625975. -50761421319.8 ]
[ -50761421319.8 7985437126.68 ]] }

The result are quite different.

Above all for the final result if I work for a regression, where
Beta = [(X'X)^(-1)X']Y,
where Y= [[ 20.0039363988 ]
[ 20.0039203398 ]
[ 20.0039138995 ]
[ 20.0039080362 ]].

I am somewhat puzzled in the choice
between TRN and TRAN when calculating
for the beta values.
 « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - Gil - 11-16-2019, 11:49 AM RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - grsbanks - 11-16-2019, 12:59 PM RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - Dave Britten - 11-16-2019, 01:07 PM RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - Werner - 11-16-2019, 01:49 PM RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - Valentin Albillo - 11-16-2019, 06:17 PM RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - Gil - 11-16-2019, 07:01 PM RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - Gil - 11-16-2019, 07:12 PM RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - Gene - 11-17-2019, 12:43 AM RE: HP50G : TRN vs TRAN - Gil - 05-09-2021 10:35 PM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)