Post Reply 
RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57)
02-16-2020, 03:41 PM
Post: #5
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57)
Interesting discussion...I agree that being able to see a full equation allows the operator to verify that this was the intended math. On the other hand, an operator using RPN, I feel (from my own experience) is much more intimately involved with the math being done. It reminds me of a discussion going on in the meteorology forecasting community concerning looking at computer real time surface analysis vs hand drawn analysis. At the SPC (NOAA/NWS’s Storm Prediction Center), the forecasters are encouraged to preform hand analysis as it is felt that this involves the forecaster to a greater extent into a full awareness of the initial atmospheric state.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - SlideRule - 02-10-2020, 12:23 PM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - Dave Britten - 02-15-2020, 10:43 PM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - toml_12953 - 02-16-2020, 01:53 AM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - Dave Britten - 02-16-2020, 02:04 AM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - lrdheat - 02-16-2020 03:41 PM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - lrdheat - 02-16-2020, 03:48 PM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - ijabbott - 02-16-2020, 05:22 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)