newRPL - Updated to build 1510 [official build remains at 1487]

[Sylvain Cote]

(08-09-2021 07:25 PM)Wes Loewer Wrote:  (Are there other languages that execute FOR loops at least once like this?)

I am not a RPL specialist here, but the problem lies that the loop tester is in the NEXT or the STEP instruction instead of in the FOR instruction.
I agree that this is unconventional at best, I would suggest to create a new instruction (ex: FORIF, IFFOR, etc) that would include an embedded IF in the FOR, thus not breaking existing programs.
My two cents.
Sylvain