Post Reply 
@Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article
06-04-2014, 06:45 PM (This post was last modified: 06-04-2014 06:46 PM by pito.)
Post: #28
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article
Caution: I've seen the situation where when 9 degree test had been compiled under C (crappy double precision) it gave 9.0. The C had optimized the math off, as it is symmetrical. Hopefully wolfram's alfa does not do the same when the 9 degree formula is entered in Smile
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
@Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - Tugdual - 05-31-2014, 08:00 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-01-2014, 08:28 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-02-2014, 10:13 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-02-2014, 10:58 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-02-2014, 11:05 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-02-2014, 11:20 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-03-2014, 02:02 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 02:52 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 06:06 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 06:30 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014 06:45 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 07:16 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 07:30 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 07:51 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 08:12 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 08:34 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 09:21 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 09:33 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 09:41 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 09:50 PM
RE: @Thomas Klemm -> CORDIC Article - pito - 06-04-2014, 10:46 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)