Larger stack size
|
12-29-2020, 10:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-29-2020 10:11 PM by robve.)
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Larger stack size
(12-29-2020 09:07 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote:(12-29-2020 05:56 PM)Allen Wrote: Symbolically it does. Since the dawn of computing it's been "top down" or right associative. Otherwise it is a bug. However, mathematicians like Neil Sloane take a much more creative look at this problem with "Dungeon Numbers - Numberphile" giving "top down" an entirely different meaning https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNx3JxRhnZE One of my favorite videos. "I count on old friends" -- HP 71B,Prime|Ti VOY200,Nspire CXII CAS|Casio fx-CG50...|Sharp PC-G850,E500,2500,1500,14xx,13xx,12xx... |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)