[VA] Short & Sweet Math Challenge #25 "San Valentin's Special: Weird Math"
|
02-18-2021, 06:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-19-2021 03:10 PM by Nihotte(lma).)
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [VA] Short & Sweet Math Challenge #25 "San Valentin's Special: Weird Math...
(02-14-2021 08:58 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote: UPDATED 2021.02.19 - 04.10PM to comply with the mention : Please do NOT include CODE panels in your replies to this thread Hi, Just to say, I've taken part of the challenge too ! However, I've progressed more slowly than you all... For a. and b. points I began with my HP35s : ** LBL V INPUT S // 1 for stop INPUT L // 100000 for loops CLΣ 1 SEED RCL L STO I 009 CLx STO J STO C 012 1 STO + J RANDOM STO + C RCL C RCL S x > y GTO V012 0 RCL J Σ+ DSE I GTO V009 RCL L RCL S x-mean RTN XEQ V001 with S=1 and L=1E5 gave 2.71959 about 6 hours later Then, I've brought out my 48G << DEPTH DROPN 0 'SUM' STO SEED RDZ 1 LOOPS FOR i 0 DUP DO SWAP 1 + SWAP RAND + DUP TOP UNTIL >= END DROP 'SUM' STO+ NEXT TOP LOOPS SUM OVER / >> with : VAW is the program above 1 'TOP' STO // 1, 2 .. 20 1 'SEED' STO 100000 'LOOPS' STO And the run of VAW gives 1 100000 2.71959 in the stack and SUM is 271959 The result appears more rapidly than with the HP35s, of course 6x faster, perhaps Unsurprisingly, my results match those of robve's post for the successive limit values 1, 2 .. 20 retained ------ The result for a limit of 1 seems to be close to e. But, I've tested something on my HP10BII+ I decided to enter all couple of result by Σ+ in the calculator C STAT 1 INPUT 2.71959 and Σ+ 2 INPUT 4.67827 and Σ+ 2.021 INPUT 4.71806 and Σ+ 3 INPUT 6.66808 and Σ+ pi INPUT 6.95027 and Σ+ 4 INPUT 8.66601 and Σ+ 5 INPUT 10.66641 and Σ+ 5+1/6 INPUT 10.99947 and Σ+ 10 INPUT 20.65914 and Σ+ 15 INPUT 30.66700 and Σ+ 20 INPUT 40.66927 and Σ+ then, [BLUE] REGR and [-] to select 0 - bESt Fit [INPUT] and, 2 [ORANGE] ŷ,m displaying bESt Fit with the choice of 1 - LinEAr and the result of 4.6773856... followed by [ORANGE] ^x,r resulting in 2 and [SWAP] giving 0,999999... as a correlation coefficient to describe the goodness of the fit. Now here is where I am going with my initial idea : 1000 [ORANGE] ŷ,m 1999.68225... 100000 [ORANGE] ŷ,m 199900.966545... 200000 [ORANGE] ŷ,m 399801.25371... 1E9 [ORANGE] ŷ,m 1999002872.33... 9999999999 [ORANGE] ŷ,m 19990028715,2... I don't know what to think but, it's giving a result near of 2*x decreased by something that is proportional to x (based on m, in fact) !!! |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)