what is wrong with this watch?
|
04-28-2021, 02:15 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: what is wrong with this watch?
(04-28-2021 01:39 AM)Dave Britten Wrote: I think the explanation I've heard is that clocks will use IIII instead of the more correct IV because having both IV and VI printed upside-down near the bottom of the face can be a bit visually confusing. But then they go and keep both IX and XI, so who knows. The use of IV is a relatively modern construct. Since clocks that use Roman numerals are trying to impart a feeling of age, they use the more correct (for the Middle Ages and earlier) IIII. https://museum.seiko.co.jp/en/knowledge/...20century. Tom L Cui bono? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)